Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 September 20243338669

Land at Junction of High Street, Lower Avenue, Leamington Spa, Warks, CV31 3AQ

Authority
Warwick District Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Clarke B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the nearby Royal Leamington Spa Conservation Area
  • the effect of the development upon the setting of the Grade II* Listed Building of All Saints Church
  • whether appropriate living conditions would be secured for the future occupiers of the development, with particular regard to air quality and noise
  • whether the effects of the development are such that a legal agreement is required to secure financial mitigation, with specific regards to the provision of outdoors space

What decided it

The cumulative effect of significant adverse impacts on heritage assets, character and appearance, living conditions, and lack of adequate open space provision, which could not be mitigated and were not outweighed by the moderate public benefits of the development.

the less than substantial harm to the setting of the Grade II* Listed Building and the character and appearance of the conservation area was not outweighed by the moderate public benefits of housing supply, economic benefits, and reuse of previously developed land

Framework references: 206, 208

Plan policies cited: Policy BE1, Policy HE1, Policy RLS3, Policy BE3, Policy NE5, Policy RLS13, Policy BE2, Policy DM1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.