Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 January 20253339019

157 Kilburn High Road, Brent, London, NW6 7HU

Planning appeal 3339019 at 157 Kilburn High Road, Brent, London, NW6 7HU (London Borough of Brent) was dismissed on 13 January 2025 by Inspector Jones H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development complies with the relevant development plan policy which relates to offices and Local Employment Sites.

rear extension to ground floor commercial property and conversion of the upper floors into three self-contained flats together with ground, first and second floor extensions, and a mansard roof addition

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Jones H
Postcode
NW6 7HU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development complies with the relevant development plan policy which relates to offices and Local Employment Sites
  • The effects of the proposed development upon the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to outlook and light
  • The provision that would be made for urban greening
  • Whether the proposed development is required to provide accessible housing and, if so, whether it complies with relevant development plan policy

What decided it

The loss of office accommodation within a Local Employment Site without adequate justification under Policy BE3 and E1, combined with unacceptable harm to neighbouring living conditions regarding outlook and light, and failure to provide urban greening, outweighs the limited benefit of three additional dwellings.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy BE3Policy E1Policy DMP1Policy BH4Policy BGI1Policy G5Policy G6Policy D7Policy H2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 780 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Brent

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266011176
    7 Chalfont Avenue, Wembley, HA9 6NW
  2. Allowed22 October 20266011738
    102 West Hill, Wembley, HA9 9RR
  3. Allowed9 October 20266010212
    276 Willesden Lane, London, NW2 5RB
  4. Dismissed6 October 20266013509
    115 Brondesbury Road, London, NW6 6RY
  5. Allowed1 October 20266011602
    28A Ridley Road, London, NW10 5UA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.