Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 June 20243339045

12 The Little Boltons, London, SW10 9LP

Planning appeal 3339045 at 12 The Little Boltons, London, SW10 9LP (Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea) was dismissed on 19 June 2024 by Inspector Poole S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties, with particular regard to noise and disturbance during the construction period.

described on the application form as “Excavation under footprint of house and part of front and rear gardens to form a single basement level and lowering of the existing lower ground floor slab to improve floor to ceiling height at this level; rebuilding of the 1960s two storey rear addition at lower ground and ground floor levels; construction of a single storey side addition at lower ground level; enlargement of rear dormer window and replacement of existing dormers on the front and side roof slopes; and elevational alterations”

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Poole S
Postcode
SW10 9LP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties, with particular regard to noise and disturbance during the construction period

What decided it

The proposed basement, due to its size and the consequential duration of construction activity, would have an unacceptable effect on the living conditions of occupiers of neighbouring properties and is contrary to Policy CL7 of the Local Plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CL7

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 827 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed24 February 20266000895
    6 St. Marys Gate, London, W8 5UA
  2. Allowed8 January 20263362805
    53 Egerton Crescent, London, SW3 2ED
  3. Dismissed22 December 20253369601
    39 Harrington Gardens, London, SW7 4JU
  4. Dismissed21 November 20253371695
    Flat 7, 50 Hans Place, London, SW1X 0LA
  5. Dismissed30 October 20253370287
    38 Smith Terrace, London, SW3 4DH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.