Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed9 September 20243339059

99 Lee Road, London, SE3 9DZ

Planning appeal 3339059 at 99 Lee Road, London, SE3 9DZ (Royal Borough of Greenwich) was allowed on 9 September 2024 by Inspector Skelly C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and its significance as a non-designated heritage asset (NDHA).

construction of a single storey rear extension at upper ground floor with terrace and extension to basement at lower ground floor and associated works

Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Skelly C
Postcode
SE3 9DZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and its significance as a non-designated heritage asset (NDHA)
  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Blackheath Park Conservation Area (CA)

What decided it

The proposed extension would not be visible from Lee Road or the wider Conservation Area and would preserve the symmetrical front appearance of the pair of dwellings, thereby protecting both the non-designated heritage asset and the character and appearance of the conservation area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3Policy HC1Policy DH1Policy DH3Policy DH(a)Policy DH(j)Policy DH(h)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 209Paragraph 203

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

426 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Greenwich

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed30 September 20266007470
    44 Ceres Road, London, SE18 1HP
  2. Dismissed14 July 20263375007
    Powis Street, Outside no.37 Shaba Hair and Cosmetics, , London, SE18 6HZ
  3. Unknown14 July 20263374853
    Outside No. 37 Shaba Hair & Cosmetics, Powis Street, London, SE18 6HZ
  4. Dismissed6 July 20263376767
    2-4 Court Yard, Eltham, SE9 5PZ
  5. Allowed19 June 20266000585
    278, Halfway Street, Sidcup, Greenwich, DA15 8DT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.