Planning appeal decision
Thompson Hall, St Michaels Road, Sittingbourne, Kent, ME10 3DN
Planning appeal 3339087 at Thompson Hall, St Michaels Road, Sittingbourne, Kent, ME10 3DN (Swale Borough Council) was dismissed on 14 January 2025 by Inspector Pattison B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the local area bearing in mind the extent to which it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Sittingbourne Conservation Area.
Demolition of existing training centre building and erection of new four storey building to form 9 no. Class C3 residential flats (Resubmission of 23/500131/FULL)
- Authority
- Swale Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Pattison B
- Postcode
- ME10 3DN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the local area bearing in mind the extent to which it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Sittingbourne Conservation Area
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers, with particular regard to privacy and natural light
- whether the proposal would provide satisfactory provision for the storage and collection of waste
- whether the proposal would adversely affect the integrity of the Swale Special Protection Area
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Sittingbourne Conservation Area, combined with unacceptable privacy impacts on future occupants, outweighs the benefits of nine additional dwellings, particularly given the Framework's requirement to give great weight to the conservation of designated heritage assets.
The substantial weight given to housing delivery and brownfield land use was outweighed by the substantial negative weight of harm to the conservation area and failure to provide high-quality development and satisfactory amenity for future occupants, with heritage protection policies providing a clear reason for refusal under the tilted balance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP4Policy CP8Policy DM14Policy DM32Policy DM33Policy DM7
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 61Paragraph 73Paragraph 111Paragraph 125Paragraph 131Paragraph 135
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Swale
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed13 October 20266004547Land at Plumpudding Lane, Dargate, ME13 9HB
- Allowed1 October 202660147498, Ospringe Road, Faversham, ME13 7LJ
- Dismissed25 September 20266010408Pigeon Farm Cottage, Cold Harbour Lane, Bobbing, ME9 8NN
- Allowed6 August 20266011728Irie, Minster Drive, Minster-on-Sea, ME12 2NG
- Dismissed14 July 20266002253Land East Of Holywell Primary School, Forge Lane, Upchurch, ME9 7AD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®