®Planning appeal decision
86 Clydesdale, Enfield, EN3 4RN
erection of a single dwellinghouse (2b3p)
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Harrison F
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 84A Clydesdale, with regard to outlook
- drainage and the management of surface water
What decided it
The adverse effects of the development—undue harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers through loss of outlook and inadequate drainage provision—significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of delivering a single dwelling.
The adverse effects of the development, comprising harm to neighbouring living conditions and inadequate drainage provision, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of housing delivery and economic benefits from a single dwelling, such that the proposal did not benefit from the presumption in favour of sustainable development.
Framework references: 11
Plan policies cited: Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021), Policy CP30 of the Core Strategy (2010), Policy DMD8 of the Development Management Document (2014), Policy SI13 of the London Plan, Policy CP21 of the Core Strategy, Policy DMD61 of the Development Management Document
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.