®Planning appeal decision
86 Clydesdale, Enfield, EN3 4RN
Planning appeal 3339094 at 86 Clydesdale, Enfield, EN3 4RN (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 6 September 2024 by Inspector Harrison F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 84A Clydesdale, with regard to outlook.
erection of a single dwellinghouse (2b3p)
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Harrison F
- Postcode
- EN3 4RN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 84A Clydesdale, with regard to outlook
- drainage and the management of surface water
What decided it
The adverse effects of the development—undue harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers through loss of outlook and inadequate drainage provision—significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of delivering a single dwelling.
The adverse effects of the development, comprising harm to neighbouring living conditions and inadequate drainage provision, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of housing delivery and economic benefits from a single dwelling, such that the proposal did not benefit from the presumption in favour of sustainable development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D6 of the London Plan (2021)Policy CP30 of the Core Strategy (2010)Policy DMD8 of the Development Management Document (2014)Policy SI13 of the London PlanPolicy CP21 of the Core StrategyPolicy DMD61 of the Development Management Document
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in London Borough of Enfield
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed7 May 2026333610270 Sketty Road, Enfield, EN1 3SF
- Allowed24 March 2026600306645 Park Road, Enfield, EN3 6SP
- Dismissed23 March 202633757855 Cocker Road, Enfield, London, EN1 4QQ
- Dismissed17 March 202660039715 Ramscroft Close, London, N9 9JY
- Allowed10 March 20266004174256 Bury Street West, London, N9 9LB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.