Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 June 20243339224

5 East Avenue, SOUTHALL, UB1 2AQ

single storey, part two storey extension; alteration of roof from hip to gable end, rear roof extension, installation of two roof lights to front roofslope

Authority
London Borough of Ealing
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Davis J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of 7 East Avenue, with particular reference to outlook and light

What decided it

The proposed first floor rear extension would be bulky, disproportionate and incongruous in appearance, failing to be subordinate to the host dwelling and causing significant harm to the character and appearance of the area and the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers.

Plan policies cited: Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy 7.4, Policy 7.B, Policy D6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.