Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision19 June 20243339305

60 South Parade, Chiswick, Ealing, W4 5LH

the demolition of the existing garage and the construction of a single storey rear extension, a new first floor window, a loft conversion with an extension to the rear, a small dormer window to side roof slope and a partial basement excavation to provide additional living accommodation

Authority
London Borough of Ealing
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Poole S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host building and whether it preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Acton Green Conservation Area
  • whether the proposal would comply with national planning policy which seeks to steer new development away from areas at the highest risk of flooding

What decided it

The rear dormer and single-storey extension would be overly prominent and incongruous elements that would substantially harm the character and appearance of the conservation area, and the proposal failed to demonstrate compliance with flood risk policy at the application stage.

Framework references: 164

Plan policies cited: Policy 7.4, Policy 7B, Policy 7D, Policy 5.12, London Plan Policy SI 12

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.