Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed4 March 20253339330

38 Elgin Road, Poole, BH14 8QX

Planning appeal 3339330 at 38 Elgin Road, Poole, BH14 8QX (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole) was allowed on 4 March 2025 by Inspector Aqbal M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

extensions and remodelling of the existing dwelling, and the erection of a new dwelling with associated parking, access and landscaping

Authority
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Aqbal M
Postcode
BH14 8QX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the proposed development is of an acceptable quality
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbours
  • The effect of the proposal upon the integrity of the Dorset Heathlands Special Protection Area, Ramsar Site and the Dorset Heaths Special Area of Conservation, and the Poole Harbour SPA, Ramsar Site

What decided it

The submission of a Unilateral Undertaking securing financial contributions for mitigation measures in accordance with the Dorset Heathlands Planning Framework and Poole Harbour Recreation Supplementary Planning Documents, combined with the acceptable design and character impacts of the proposal, allowed the appeal to be determined in favour of the development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy PP27Policy PP28Policy PP2Policy PP32Policy PP39Policy PP37

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

227 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed15 October 20266006741
    6 Park Place, Poole, BH14 0LY
  2. Dismissed29 September 20266007836
    65a Richmond Wood Road, Bournemouth, BH8 9DQ
  3. Allowed28 September 20266007175
    281-291 and The Old Joinery, Bournemouth Road, Poole, BH14 9AH
  4. Allowed24 September 20266007187
    5 Higher Blandford Road, Poole, BH18 9AB
  5. Allowed4 September 20266011111
    18 Sandbourne Road, Bournemouth, BH4 8JH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.