Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 August 20243339476

Flat 3, 70 Canfield Gardens, Camden, LONDON, NW6 3ED

replacement of existing wooden balustrades with glass balustrades

Authority
London Borough of Camden
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Marriott H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the character or appearance of the South Hampstead Conservation Area would be preserved or enhanced

What decided it

The glass balustrades would be an incongruous, visually jarring addition to a historic building in a conservation area that would fail to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the South Hampstead Conservation Area, contrary to the statutory presumption under section 72(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.

Framework references: 208

Plan policies cited: Policy D1 (Design), Policy D2 (Heritage)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.