Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 December 20243339487

Orchard Paddock, Main Road, Christian Malford, CHIPPENHAM, Wiltshire , SN15 4BA

the erection of replacement dwelling and garage

Authority
Wiltshire Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Thandi B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site is an appropriate location for new housing having regard to local and national planning policies
  • The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area
  • Flood risk

What decided it

The proposal fails to accord with the development plan as a whole, being located outside the settlement boundary in an inappropriate location for new housing, adversely affecting character and appearance, and failing the sequential test for flood risk.

The adverse impacts of the development—inappropriate location, harm to character and appearance, and failure to pass the sequential flood risk test—significantly and demonstrably outweigh the limited benefits of housing supply contribution and construction employment, particularly given the Council's demonstrated 4.6-year housing land supply.

Framework references: 11, 77, 165, 224, 226

Plan policies cited: Core Policy 1, Core Policy 2, Core Policy 10, Core Policy 51, Core Policy 57, Core Policy 60, Core Policy 61, Core Policy 67, Policy H4, Policy D1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.