Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 November 20243339491

O/S 244 Fore Street, London, N18 2QD

Planning appeal 3339491 at O/S 244 Fore Street, London, N18 2QD (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 7 November 2024 by Inspector Harrison F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, bearing in mind it would be within the Fore Street Conservation Area (FSCA) and in the setting of a nearby listed building.

removal and replacement of kiosk O/S 223 Fore Street, re-siting of bike racks, with new single black telephone kiosk and ancillary advertisement O/S 244 Fore Street

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Harrison F
Postcode
N18 2QD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, bearing in mind it would be within the Fore Street Conservation Area (FSCA) and in the setting of a nearby listed building
  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety

What decided it

The harm to the significance of the designated heritage assets (conservation area and listed building setting) outweighed the limited public benefits of enhanced telecommunications infrastructure, particularly given the availability of alternative locations.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D8Policy HC1Policy CP30Policy CP31Policy CP25Policy DMD37Policy DMD41Policy DMD44
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 118Paragraph 205

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

354 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed7 November 20243339494
    O/S 244 Fore Street, London, N18 2QD
  2. Allowed25 January 20233298867
    Area of Footpath Located off, Chequers Way, London, N13 6DA
  3. Dismissed17 August 20223280481
    Area of Footpath, Junction of London and Lincoln Roads, Southbury, Enfield, EN2 6EW
  4. Dismissed13 July 20223290597
    Stone Hall (Fpa), Houndsden Road, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LP
  5. Dismissed5 July 20223279544
    Area of Footpath, Great Cambridge Road, London, N9 9JJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.