®Planning appeal decision
87 -97 Chase Side, Southgate, London, N14 5BU
the erection of single storey to form fourth floor to provide 12 dwellings in accordance with Schedule 2, Class AB of The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended)
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Hobbs J
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of 7, 9, 11, 13, 15 and 17 Crown Lane (Nos 7-17), with particular regard to outlook
- whether an acceptable planning obligation has been made to ensure that the proposal would be car-free
- whether the proposal would provide acceptable cycle storage
What decided it
The proposal would have a harmful effect on the living conditions of occupiers of Nos 7-17 Crown Lane with particular regard to outlook, appearing overbearing despite design mitigation, which was contrary to paragraph 135 of the Framework.
Framework references: 135, 114, 116
Plan policies cited: Policy DMD10, Policy DMD45, Policy LP45, Policy T5, Policy CP25, Policy SD8, Policy GG2
Judgments cited: Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.