Planning appeal decision
Church Farm, Preston Candover Road, Upper Wield, GU34 5NG
Planning appeal 3339780 at Church Farm, Preston Candover Road, Upper Wield, GU34 5NG (East Hampshire District Council) was dismissed on 21 February 2025 by Inspector Cahalane R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed dwelling would be in a suitable location having regard to local policies governing housing in rural areas.
Demolition of existing farm buildings and erection of new single storey four-bedroom dwelling, with integral garage and associated landscaping
- Authority
- East Hampshire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Cahalane R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed dwelling would be in a suitable location having regard to local policies governing housing in rural areas
- whether it has been demonstrated that the proposal meets a community need or realises local community aspirations, and has clear community support
- the effect on the character and appearance of the site and the area within the countryside
What decided it
The proposal's conflict with the spatial strategy directing development to settlements, combined with significant harm to rural character and appearance, outweighed the housing supply benefits when assessed against the tilted balance.
the adverse impacts of locational unsuitability and significant harm to character and appearance significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of one dwelling towards housing supply, despite the District's housing shortfall
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP2Policy CP10Policy CP19Policy CP20Policy CP29Saved Policy H14Policy CP1Policy CP9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 232
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in East Hampshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed29 October 2026601335385 Chase Road, Lindford, Bordon, GU35 0RS
- Allowed29 October 202660133689 Nightjar Road, Bordon, GU35 0GJ
- Allowed28 October 20266012533362 Catherington Lane, Catherington, Waterlooville, PO8 0TU
- Dismissed27 October 20266011297Land Rear of 74 - 76 Sunderton Lane, Clanfield, PO8 0NT
- Allowed12 October 20266006152Hurlands, Gentles Lane, Passfield, Liphook, GU30 7RY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®