Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 September 20243339806

Land between Brooklyn and Broomfield, Moggie Lane, Adlington, Cheshire, SK10 4NY

outline planning application for the construction of 2 dwellings with all matters reserved except access

Authority
Cheshire East
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Major R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing significant harm to openness, and the benefits do not clearly outweigh this harm to justify very special circumstances.

the benefits of housing delivery, economic benefits, and modest improvements to pedestrian safety and highway access did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and harm to openness

Framework references: 11, 142, 143, 152, 153, 154, 225

Plan policies cited: Policy PG 3, Policy PG 10, Policy MP 1, Policy SD 1, Policy SD 2

Judgments cited: Julian Wood v SSCLG, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWVA Civ 195; Cala Homes v SoSCLG [2011] EWCA Civ 639

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.