Planning appeal decision
Land at Dinting Vale, Dinting, Glossop, Derbyshire, SK13 6PA
Planning appeal 3339815 at Land at Dinting Vale, Dinting, Glossop, Derbyshire, SK13 6PA (High Peak Borough Council) was allowed on 22 July 2024 by Inspector Wildgoose G, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal is consistent with the objectives of local and national planning policies relating to the location and type of housing, including provision of or contributions towards affordable housing, having regard to financial viability.
residential development comprising 92 dwellings including areas of public open space, landscaping and associated works
- Authority
- High Peak Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Wildgoose G
- Postcode
- SK13 6PA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal is consistent with the objectives of local and national planning policies relating to the location and type of housing, including provision of or contributions towards affordable housing, having regard to financial viability
- The effect of the proposed development on highway and pedestrian safety, with particular regard to the means of access from Dinting Vale (A57) and the relationship with Adderley Place (a public right of way also known as FP50) and Simmondley Lane
- The effect of the proposed development on trees, including those protected by a temporary Tree Preservation Order (TPO)
- The effect of the proposed development on air quality, with particular regard to the Air Quality Management Area (AQMA) designated on the A57
- The effect of the proposed development on biodiversity
What decided it
The Inspector's conclusion that, when the development plan was read as a whole and viability evidence demonstrated affordable housing could not be delivered, the proposal accorded with the development plan and no unacceptable harms arose (subject to conditions and the S106 agreement) was decisive in allowing the appeal.
The identified benefits of housing delivery, biodiversity net gain, tree management, energy/water efficiency, economic/social benefits and public open space were weighed as significant to moderate benefits, and as no unacceptable harm was found (subject to conditions and planning obligations), the balance favoured allowing the appeal in accordance with the development plan as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S1Policy S2Policy S3Policy S5Policy H1Policy H2Policy H3Policy H4Policy DS4Policy CF6Policy CF7Policy EQ1Policy EQ2Policy EQ5Policy EQ6Policy EQ7Policy EQ8Policy EQ9Policy EQ10Policy EQ11Policy CF3Policy CF4Policy CF5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 115
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in High Peak
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed12 May 20266004024154 Manchester Road, Chapel En Le Frith, Derbyshire, SK23 9TP
- Dismissed6 May 20266006557Elvista, 12 Jones Street, Hadfield, Glossop, Derbyshire, SK13 1BZ
- Allowed12 February 2026600109266 Chunal Lane, Glossop, Derbyshire, SK13 6JX
- Dismissed10 February 20266001354Land East of Linglongs Road, Whaley Bridge, SK23 7DU
- Dismissed21 January 20263372294Cote Bank Farm, Unnamed Road From Stubbins Lane To Tithe Barn Farm, Chinley, Derbyshire, SK23 7NP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®