Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed22 July 20243339815

Land at Dinting Vale, Dinting, Glossop, Derbyshire, SK13 6PA

Planning appeal 3339815 at Land at Dinting Vale, Dinting, Glossop, Derbyshire, SK13 6PA (High Peak Borough Council) was allowed on 22 July 2024 by Inspector Wildgoose G, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal is consistent with the objectives of local and national planning policies relating to the location and type of housing, including provision of or contributions towards affordable housing, having regard to financial viability.

residential development comprising 92 dwellings including areas of public open space, landscaping and associated works

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Wildgoose G
Postcode
SK13 6PA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal is consistent with the objectives of local and national planning policies relating to the location and type of housing, including provision of or contributions towards affordable housing, having regard to financial viability
  • The effect of the proposed development on highway and pedestrian safety, with particular regard to the means of access from Dinting Vale (A57) and the relationship with Adderley Place (a public right of way also known as FP50) and Simmondley Lane
  • The effect of the proposed development on trees, including those protected by a temporary Tree Preservation Order (TPO)
  • The effect of the proposed development on air quality, with particular regard to the Air Quality Management Area (AQMA) designated on the A57
  • The effect of the proposed development on biodiversity

What decided it

The Inspector's conclusion that, when the development plan was read as a whole and viability evidence demonstrated affordable housing could not be delivered, the proposal accorded with the development plan and no unacceptable harms arose (subject to conditions and the S106 agreement) was decisive in allowing the appeal.

The identified benefits of housing delivery, biodiversity net gain, tree management, energy/water efficiency, economic/social benefits and public open space were weighed as significant to moderate benefits, and as no unacceptable harm was found (subject to conditions and planning obligations), the balance favoured allowing the appeal in accordance with the development plan as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy S1Policy S2Policy S3Policy S5Policy H1Policy H2Policy H3Policy H4Policy DS4Policy CF6Policy CF7Policy EQ1Policy EQ2Policy EQ5Policy EQ6Policy EQ7Policy EQ8Policy EQ9Policy EQ10Policy EQ11Policy CF3Policy CF4Policy CF5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 115

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

46 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in High Peak

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed12 May 20266004024
    154 Manchester Road, Chapel En Le Frith, Derbyshire, SK23 9TP
  2. Dismissed6 May 20266006557
    Elvista, 12 Jones Street, Hadfield, Glossop, Derbyshire, SK13 1BZ
  3. Allowed12 February 20266001092
    66 Chunal Lane, Glossop, Derbyshire, SK13 6JX
  4. Dismissed10 February 20266001354
    Land East of Linglongs Road, Whaley Bridge, SK23 7DU
  5. Dismissed21 January 20263372294
    Cote Bank Farm, Unnamed Road From Stubbins Lane To Tithe Barn Farm, Chinley, Derbyshire, SK23 7NP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.