Planning appeal decision
Church Farm West, Bramshill Road, Hook, RG27 0PS
Planning appeal 3340605 at Church Farm West, Bramshill Road, Hook, RG27 0PS (Hart District Council) was allowed on 10 September 2024 by Inspector Steen A, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the residential use of the caravans is in a suitable location in terms of access to services and facilities, or whether there is an essential need for workers to be accommodated at the farm.
without planning permission, the material change of use of the Land from agriculture to a mixed use for agriculture, the stationing of caravans for residential occupation and the erection of six utility sheds used in association with the unauthorised residential use
- Authority
- Hart District Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Steen A
- Postcode
- RG27 0PS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the residential use of the caravans is in a suitable location in terms of access to services and facilities, or whether there is an essential need for workers to be accommodated at the farm
- The effect of the caravans and utility sheds on the intrinsic character and beauty of the landscape
- The effect of the development on the Bramshill Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (SPA)
- Whether there are other material considerations (such as need for seasonal accommodation for agricultural workers) that would outweigh any harm
What decided it
The fallback position under Article 3 and Class A, Part 5, Schedule 2 of the GPDO for seasonal agricultural worker caravan use carried great weight and was sufficient to outweigh the development plan conflict.
the harm to the intrinsic character and beauty of the landscape and conflict with Policies SS1, NBE1 and SD1 were outweighed by the fallback position under the GPDO, which carried great weight, once potential SPA effects were mitigated by condition and part of the unilateral undertaking
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SS1Policy NBE1Policy ED1Policy SD1Policy NRM6Policy NBE3Policy NBE4
- Judgments
- People Over Wind, Peter Sweetman v Coillte Teoranta in the Court of Justice of the European Union on 12 April 2018, case reference C-323/17
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Hart
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Notice upheld29 September 20253343856159 Aldershot Road, Church Crookham, Fleet, GU52 8JS
- Dismissed24 September 20253340101Chestnut House Redlands Lane, Crondall, Farnham, GU10 5RF
- Notice varied and upheld14 July 20253328103Hares Farm, Pickaxe Lane, South Warnborough, Hook, RG29 1SD
- Notice varied and upheld17 April 20253343755Land North of Winchfield Court, Pale Lane, Winchfield, Hook, RG27 8SP
- Notice varied and upheld20 February 20253329483Granary Court, Alton Road, South Warnborough, RG29 1RZ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®