Planning appeal decision
Plot A, Three Sons, Hampstead Lane, Nettlestead, ME18 5HN
Planning appeal 3340982 at Plot A, Three Sons, Hampstead Lane, Nettlestead, ME18 5HN (Maidstone Borough Council) was allowed on 20 May 2025 by Inspector Shields T, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the use of the site as a residential caravan site would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
a breach of Condition 2 of planning permission Ref: APP/U2235/C/15/3138039, granted on appeal, in respect of the matters stated in an enforcement notice (Ref: ENF/500852) issued on 2 October 2015
- Authority
- Maidstone Borough Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Shields T
- Postcode
- ME18 5HN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the use of the site as a residential caravan site would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- The effect on openness of the Green Belt
- The effect on the character and appearance of the area
- Flood risk
- If inappropriate development in the Green Belt, whether any harm to the Green Belt, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The harm to the Green Belt and from flood risk would be sufficiently reduced by granting only a temporary (4-year) permission, allowing the unmet pitch need and personal circumstances to clearly outweigh that reduced harm.
The unmet pitch need, lack of alternative sites and the family's personal circumstances did not clearly outweigh Green Belt and flood risk harm sufficient for a permanent permission, but did clearly outweigh that harm once reduced by a 4-year temporary time limit, so very special circumstances were found to justify only a temporary permission
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy LPRSP9Policy LPRHOU8Policy LPRQD4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 155Paragraph 173Paragraph 174Paragraph 181
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Maidstone Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Quashed On Legal Grounds28 September 20263378504Pear View, Symonds Lane, Yalding, Kent, ME18 6HA
- Notice upheld17 July 20263377356Stephens Bridge Field, Water Lane, Headcorn, Ashford, Kent, TN27 9JP
- Planning permission granted22 June 20263377362Lenwood, Polhill Lane, Harrietsham, Maidstone, Kent, ME17 1LG
- Planning permission granted10 June 20263347386Land at The Meadows, Lenham Road, Headcorn, TN27 9LG
- Notice varied and upheld24 April 202633647405 Bower Place, Maidstone, Kent, ME16 8BG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®