Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision22 April 20253341014

The Orchard, Lynton Meadow, Chilbolton Stockbridge, SO20 6BE

without planning permission, the construction of three (3) buildings on the land, comprising; (i) a shed (edged in blue and marked 'A' on the plan attached to the notice); (ii) a metal framed building with tarpaulin cover (edged in blue and marked 'B' on the attached plan); (iii) a timber cabin building (edged in blue and marked 'C' on the attached plan)

Authority
Test Valley Borough Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Hawkins S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the buildings are in a suitable location in the countryside, having regard to the Development Plan and national policy concerning sustainable development
  • Whether the time allowed for complying with the enforcement notice requirements is too short

What decided it

Buildings A and B are reasonably required to maintain the site's lawful amenity use, whereas building C is substantially larger than necessary and serves residential rather than maintenance purposes, making it unsuitable for countryside location.

Plan policies cited: Policy COM2, Policy COM11, Policy HD4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.