Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 January 20253341066

76 Portsmouth Road, Woolston, Southampton, SO19 9AN

Planning appeal 3341066 at 76 Portsmouth Road, Woolston, Southampton, SO19 9AN (Southampton City Council) was dismissed on 27 January 2025 by Inspector Conde L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the Old Woolston (4) Conservation Area.

demolition of existing dwelling and garage and the erection of 8No. new dwellings with car parking and use of existing access onto Portsmouth Road

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Conde L
Postcode
SO19 9AN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the Old Woolston (4) Conservation Area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living condition of neighbouring residents
  • the effect of the proposal on European Protected Sites

What decided it

The substantial harm to the Old Woolston Conservation Area caused by the loss of the key heritage building and the cramped, contrived layout of the replacement development outweighs the modest housing benefits of the scheme.

The benefits of housing delivery and socio-economic benefits were outweighed by the substantial harm to the designated heritage asset and harm to neighbouring living conditions; the heritage asset protection policies provided a clear reason for refusal under paragraph 11(d)(i) of the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
SDP1(i)SDP7(i)SDP7(ii)SDP7(iii)SDP7(iv)SDP9(v)SDP9(i)SDP9(iv)HE1(i)HE2CS5CS13CS14
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 73Paragraph 214

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

60 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Southampton

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Notice upheld15 September 20263371847
    171 Peartree Avenue, Southampton, SO19 7RA
  2. Notice upheld14 September 20263373218
    17 Vespasian Road, Southampton, SO18 1AY
  3. Dismissed27 August 20266010618
    Pavment Outside 10 Bargate Street, Southampton, SO14 2DA
  4. Dismissed27 August 20266010617
    Pavment Outside 10 Bargate Street, Southampton, SO14 2DA
  5. Notice upheld13 August 20263377915
    124 Bevois Valley Road, Southampton, SO14 0JZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.