Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 August 20243341160

623, Stretford Road, Old Trafford, Manchester, M16 0QA

Planning appeal 3341160 at 623, Stretford Road, Old Trafford, Manchester, M16 0QA (Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 8 August 2024 by Inspector Ollerenshaw M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

change of use of office building (B1) to 4 no. residential apartments (C3) with store room in the basement and alterations to elevations

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Ollerenshaw M
Postcode
M16 0QA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether it would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to privacy and outlook

What decided it

The adverse impacts of harm to character and appearance and inadequate living conditions for future occupiers significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of housing delivery, even under the tilted balance.

The moderate positive weight given to the provision of four new residential units and reuse of a vacant building was significantly outweighed by the substantial harm to character and appearance and failure to provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy L7 of the Trafford Local Plan: Core Strategy 2012PfE Plan Policy JP-P1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 131Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

104 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed26 August 20266010095
    846 Chester Road, Stretford, Trafford, M32 0QJ
  2. Allowed14 August 20266008227
    Land At Rear Of 30 Croftsbank Road, And To Side Of 5 Primrose Avenue, Urmston, M41 0TY
  3. Dismissed26 June 20266004742
    22 Clarence Road, Hale, Trafford, WA15 8SF
  4. Notice upheld29 April 20263372464
    45 Princess Road, Urmston, Manchester, M41 5ST
  5. Dismissed22 April 20266003157
    48 Alphonsus Street, Manchester, Gt Man, M16 7QS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.