Planning appeal decision
Land at Scarlet Meadow, Matts Hill Road, Rainham, Gillingham Kent, ME9 7XA
Planning appeal 3341250 at Land at Scarlet Meadow, Matts Hill Road, Rainham, Gillingham Kent, ME9 7XA (Medway Council) was dismissed on 17 February 2025 by Inspector King T, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The main issue for both appeals A and B is the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, with particular regard to its location within the North Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, now the North Kent Downs National Landscape (NKDNL), and locally designated valued landscapes, namely the North Downs Special Landscape Area (NDSLA), an identified 'Strategic Gap' and also the Matts Hill Farmland Character Area (MHFCA).
‘Retention of dayroom.’ Formal
- Authority
- Medway Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- King T
- Postcode
- ME9 7XE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The main issue for both appeals A and B is the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, with particular regard to its location within the North Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, now the North Kent Downs National Landscape (NKDNL), and locally designated valued landscapes, namely the North Downs Special Landscape Area (NDSLA), an identified 'Strategic Gap' and also the Matts Hill Farmland Character Area (MHFCA).
What decided it
Whether the height of the day-room building would be reduced (via the Unilateral Undertaking) so as to overcome the harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding protected landscape.
For Appeal A the building's excessive height caused harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding area outweighing any other considerations, leading to dismissal; for Appeal B the UU-secured reduction in ridge height was sufficient to make the development acceptable, tipping the balance in favour of allowing the appeal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- BNE1BNE25BNE31BNE32BNE33
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 187Paragraph 189
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Medway
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Notice upheld10 April 202633428714 Everest Lane, Rochester, ME2 3XA
- Notice varied and upheld24 March 20263338789100 Woodside, Gillingham, ME8 0PW
- Planning permission granted19 March 20263338738382 Canterbury Street, Gillingham, ME7 5LD
- Notice upheld23 October 2025335827189 Bryant Road, Rochester, ME2 3ES
- Notice upheld20 October 2025334968220 Oakhurst Close, Chatham, ME5 9AN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®