Planning appeal decision
13 Grafton Crescent, London, NW1 8SL
a roof extension
- Authority
- London Borough of Camden
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Callister V
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect on the character and appearance of the appeal dwelling, the terrace of which it forms part and that of the local area
What decided it
The proposed mansard extension would interrupt the continuous parapet roofline of the terrace and appear as an incongruous addition that would harm the character and appearance of the Non-Designated Heritage Asset, with limited public benefits insufficient to outweigh this less than substantial harm.
Framework references: 209, 12, 16
Plan policies cited: Policy D1, Policy D2, Policy D3 (Kentish Town Neighbourhood Plan), Policy D3 (London Plan), Policy HC1 (London Plan)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®