Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision9 January 20253341829

The Old Coach House, Hawkhurst Court, Wisborough Green, West Sussex, RH14 0HS

Planning appeal 3341829 at The Old Coach House, Hawkhurst Court, Wisborough Green, West Sussex, RH14 0HS (South Downs) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 9 January 2025 by Inspector Redford R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the 'lean to' storage unit and the replacement gates on the character and appearance of the rural landscape, and on an Ancient Semi-Natural Woodland.

the addition of a 'lean to' storage unit at the rear of existing stable block, installation of a new rainwater harvesting system, replacement of existing 5 bar gate with new solid gates and making good hard surfacing in and around the stable yard

Authority
South Downs
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Other minor developments
Inspector
Redford R
Postcode
RH14 0HS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the 'lean to' storage unit and the replacement gates on the character and appearance of the rural landscape, and on an Ancient Semi-Natural Woodland

What decided it

The proposed 'lean to' storage unit failed to comply with development plan policies protecting woodland because the appellant did not provide technical evidence demonstrating that the change in surface porosity would not indirectly harm the Ancient Semi-Natural Woodland through soil quality or compaction impacts within the buffer zone.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
SD1SD4SD5SD11SD20General Policy 1 of the SDNP Partnership-Management Plan 2019

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

4 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Downs

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed14 July 20266001892
    Empshott Grange, Church Lane, Empshott, Hampshire, GU33 6HT
  2. Dismissed23 June 20266001025
    Roman Mile Farm, Bignor Park Road, Bignor, West Sussex, RH20 1HQ
  3. Dismissed28 May 20266004671
    Reeves Britannia, 140 The Causeway, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU31 4LL
  4. Dismissed27 May 20266006395
    Weyridge, The Street, Binsted, Hampshire, GU34 4PF
  5. Dismissed11 May 20266000744
    17 High Street, Lewes, East Sussex, BN7 2LN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.