Planning appeal decision
Land at Erleigh, West Street, Mayfield, East Sussex, TN20 6DR
Planning appeal 3341984 at Land at Erleigh, West Street, Mayfield, East Sussex, TN20 6DR (Wealden District Council) was allowed on 10 December 2024 by Inspector Wallace J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is a suitable location for development with regard to the locational policies of the development plan.
Erection of 4.No dwellings, upgrading of existing vehicular access, landscaping and other associated infrastructure
- Authority
- Wealden District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Wallace J
- Postcode
- TN20 6DR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is a suitable location for development with regard to the locational policies of the development plan
- the effect of the proposed development on the landscape character of the area with particular regard to whether the proposal would conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the High Weald NL
- the effect of the proposed development on the significance of designated and non-designated heritage assets
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to the design of the proposed dwellings
- the effect of the proposed development on the integrity of the Ashdown Forest SAC and SPA
What decided it
The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply engaged the tilted balance, and the substantial benefit of housing delivery outweighed the limited, localised landscape and heritage harms identified.
The substantial benefit of four dwellings' contribution to a longstanding housing land supply shortfall, together with limited benefits from enhanced environmental performance and economic activity, outweighed the great weight attached to limited harm to the High Weald National Landscape and less-than-substantial harm to the setting of the Mayfield and Coggins Mill Conservation Area, such that the adverse effects did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- LP Saved Policy EN1LP Saved Policy EN6LP Saved Policy EN19LP Saved Policy EN27LP Saved Policy GD2LP Saved Policy DC17CS Policy WCS14CS Objective SPO13
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 56Paragraph 109Paragraph 114Paragraph 115Paragraph 180Paragraph 182Paragraph 200Paragraph 205Paragraph 206Paragraph 208Paragraph 209Paragraph 212
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wealden District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed15 September 20266008314Land off Eastbourne Road, Polegate, BN26 5DD
- Dismissed22 July 20266006344Dog Walking Field, Burnt Oak Road, High Hurstwood, TN22 4AE
- Dismissed17 July 20266007376Land Adjoining 154 Station Road, Hailsham, BN27 2SB
- Allowed17 July 20266005293Milton Gate Farm, Milton Street, Polegate, BN26 5RS
- Dismissed15 July 2026600490111 Station Road, Polegate, BN26 6AT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®