Planning appeal decision
64 Portchester Road, Bournemouth, BH8 8LA
Planning appeal 3342194 at 64 Portchester Road, Bournemouth, BH8 8LA (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole) was dismissed on 20 January 2025 by Inspector Rose C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the wider area and whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Portchester Road Conservation Area.
change of use of existing dwelling to form 7no. flats, involving demolition of existing garage, erection of single storey rear extension and two storey side and rear extensions with new roofs over; insertion of new dormer roof extensions to front, side and rear following removal of existing; insertion of new and replacement windows to side elevations; external alterations; erection of a detached single storey dwelling to the rear of the plot (pedestrian access only); with revised vehicular access and associated parking, waste storage and cycle parking stores to the frontage
- Authority
- Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Rose C
- Postcode
- BH8 8LA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the wider area and whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Portchester Road Conservation Area
- whether the living conditions of future occupiers of the proposed development would be acceptable
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety, with particular regard to the provision of car parking, cycle parking and refuse storage
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to noise and disturbance
- the effect of the proposal on biodiversity on the site
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the significance of the Portchester Road Conservation Area, to which great weight must be afforded, was not outweighed by the modest public benefits of additional housing delivery.
the modest public benefits of additional housing supply, widened housing choice, effective use of land and economic benefits were outweighed by the less than substantial harm to the significance of the conservation area, to which great weight is afforded
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS21CS39CS41CS16CS18CS38CS30Policy 6.8Policy 6.10
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 16
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed14 October 2026601138341 Shillito Road, Poole, BH12 2BW
- Allowed8 October 2026600617855 Highfield Road, Bournemouth, BH9 2SE
- Dismissed29 September 2026600783665a Richmond Wood Road, Bournemouth, BH8 9DQ
- Allowed28 September 20266007175281-291 and The Old Joinery, Bournemouth Road, Poole, BH14 9AH
- Allowed24 September 202660071875 Higher Blandford Road, Poole, BH18 9AB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®