Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 August 20243342253

Land East of The Meadows, Seaton, County Durham, SR7 0QB

Planning appeal 3342253 at Land East of The Meadows, Seaton, County Durham, SR7 0QB (Durham County Council) was dismissed on 30 August 2024 by Inspector Harrison F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

75no. new homes (Use Class C3) including affordable homes and associated access, landscaping and infrastructure (as amended)

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Harrison F

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposal would provide a suitable location for housing, having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety, with regard to car parking and access arrangements

What decided it

The identified conflicts with development plan policies on character and appearance, location sustainability, and highway safety could not be outweighed by the moderate benefits of housing delivery and affordable housing provision.

the benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing, housing mix, economic benefits and biodiversity net gain were insufficient to outweigh the identified harms to character and appearance, location sustainability and highway safety

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 6Policy 10Policy 15Policy 21Policy 29Policy 39
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 12Paragraph 96Paragraph 114Paragraph 116

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

6 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Durham County Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed10 September 20266006352
    55 Bradford Crescent, Gilesgate, Durham, DH1 1HL
  2. Dismissed11 August 20266006359
    The Copse, Foxes Row, Brancepeth, DH7 8DH
  3. Allowed11 May 20266002307
    Applegarth, New Road, Crook, Durham, DL15 8NB
  4. Allowed7 May 20263376424
    Former Hallgarth Care Home, Hallgarth Street, Durham, County Durham, DH1 3AY
  5. Dismissed6 May 20266003300
    53 Frank Street, Gilesgate Moor, Durham, DH1 2JF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.