Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 December 20243342255

Land at Adastral Close, Felixstowe, Suffolk, IP11 2TP

Planning appeal 3342255 at Land at Adastral Close, Felixstowe, Suffolk, IP11 2TP (East Suffolk) was dismissed on 3 December 2024 by Inspector Dring G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is in a suitable location for the proposed development having regard to flood risk.

4 x 3 bed dwellings, the provision of off-street parking, private gardens and the relocation and upgrading of play equipment

Authority
East Suffolk
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Dring G
Postcode
IP11 2TP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site is in a suitable location for the proposed development having regard to flood risk
  • whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers with regard to noise and with reference to the operation of the nearby Port of Felixstowe
  • the effect of the proposal on open space in the local area

What decided it

The failure to demonstrate that the sequential test for flood risk had been passed, combined with the absence of a noise assessment to ensure satisfactory living conditions and the unmitigated loss of open space, meant the proposal conflicted with the development plan with no material considerations of sufficient weight to justify approval.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SCLP9.5Policy SCLP11.2Policy SCLP8.2Policy SCLP10.1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 168Paragraph 169Paragraph 191Paragraph 56

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

13 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in East Suffolk

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed5 August 20266007229
    Herons, Church Field, Walberswick, Southwold, IP18 6TG
  2. Allowed1 July 20266005926
    Herons, Church Field, Walberswick, Southwold, IP18 6TG
  3. Quashed On Legal Grounds15 June 20263345362
    Land South of 333 High Street, Walton, Felixstowe, Suffolk, IP11 9QL
  4. Dismissed4 December 20253369243
    2 Clare Avenue, Woodbridge, IP12 4ES
  5. Dismissed4 August 20253354090
    The Old Vicarage, Low Street, Brandeston, Ipswich, IP147AN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.