Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 November 20243342384

18-24 Chase Side, London, N14 5PB

Erection of a single storey roof extension to provide two additional self-contained residential units

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Scott A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the settings of the heritage assets of the Grade II* Southgate underground station, including surface building and platforms, and Grade II* listed station pylons to north and south of Southgate Station, and the Grade II listed 1-8 South Parade including eight lamp posts east and west, and whether or not it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Southgate Circus Conservation Area
  • Whether or not the proposal would lead to on-street parking stress to the detriment of highway and pedestrian safety, and whether or not there is acceptable cycle parking
  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of the future occupants with particular regard to access to outdoor space

What decided it

The material harm to the settings of the designated heritage assets and the character and appearance of the conservation area, which was not outweighed by the limited public benefits of providing two new residential units.

Framework references: 203, 205, 206, 208, 56

Plan policies cited: CP30, CP31, DMD6, DMD8, DMD37, DMD44, DMD45, DMD47, HC1, T2, T4, T5, T6.1, D6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.