®Planning appeal decision
18-24 Chase Side, London, N14 5PB
Planning appeal 3342384 at 18-24 Chase Side, London, N14 5PB (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 15 November 2024 by Inspector Scott A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the settings of the heritage assets of the Grade II* Southgate underground station, including surface building and platforms, and Grade II* listed station pylons to north and south of Southgate Station, and the Grade II listed 1-8 South Parade including eight lamp posts east and west, and whether or not it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Southgate Circus Conservation Area.
Erection of a single storey roof extension to provide two additional self-contained residential units
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Scott A
- Postcode
- N14 5PB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the settings of the heritage assets of the Grade II* Southgate underground station, including surface building and platforms, and Grade II* listed station pylons to north and south of Southgate Station, and the Grade II listed 1-8 South Parade including eight lamp posts east and west, and whether or not it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Southgate Circus Conservation Area
- Whether or not the proposal would lead to on-street parking stress to the detriment of highway and pedestrian safety, and whether or not there is acceptable cycle parking
- The effect of the development on the living conditions of the future occupants with particular regard to access to outdoor space
What decided it
The material harm to the settings of the designated heritage assets and the character and appearance of the conservation area, which was not outweighed by the limited public benefits of providing two new residential units.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CP30CP31DMD6DMD8DMD37DMD44DMD45DMD47HC1T2T4T5T6.1D6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 203Paragraph 205Paragraph 206Paragraph 208Paragraph 56
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in London Borough of Enfield
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed21 October 202660105412 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
- Allowed20 October 2026600977328 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
- Allowed28 August 202660083619 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
- Dismissed20 July 2026601035019 Wilbury Way, London, N18 1BU
- Dismissed3 June 202660048031 Moffat Road, London, N13 4SA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.