Planning appeal decision
Land at Bay Tree Cottage, Ruffet Road, Kendleshire, South Gloucestershire , BS36 1AN
Planning appeal 3342415 at Land at Bay Tree Cottage, Ruffet Road, Kendleshire, South Gloucestershire , BS36 1AN (South Gloucestershire Council) was dismissed on 19 March 2025 by Inspector Pipkin R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies.
outline application for the construction of 1no. residential dwelling with all matters reserved except access
- Authority
- South Gloucestershire Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Pipkin R
- Postcode
- BS36 1AN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety
- if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness or any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and the moderate harm to openness and character and appearance are not clearly outweighed by the modest benefits of housing supply and economic benefits, so very special circumstances do not exist.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and modest loss of openness, together with moderate harm to character and appearance, were weighed against modest benefits from housing contribution and economic benefits; the harm was not clearly outweighed and the appeal was dismissed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS5Policy CS34Policy PSP7Policy CS1Policy PSP1Policy PSP11
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 153Paragraph 11
- Judgments
- Julian Wood v SSCLG and Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195; R (Tate) v Northumberland County Council [2018] EWCA Civ 1519
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Gloucestershire Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed13 October 20266010963Elmbarn Farm, Westerleigh Road, Westerleigh, BS37 8QF
- Dismissed13 October 20266009931Land at Wapley Road, Codrington, Bristol, BS37 6RY
- Planning permission granted4 September 20263378284Land Adjacent to Orchard Farm Cottage, Pomphrey Hill, Mangotsfield, Bristol, BS16 9NF
- Planning permission granted17 August 20263378286Land At Northwick Road, Pilning, Bristol, BS35 4LX
- Dismissed13 July 20266006492Long Acre Farm, Dodington Lane, Dodington, BS37 6SD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®