Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 November 20243342427

Garages to the Rear of 104 - 114 College Road, Kensal Rise, London, NW10 5HD

Planning appeal 3342427 at Garages to the Rear of 104 - 114 College Road, Kensal Rise, London, NW10 5HD (London Borough of Brent) was dismissed on 29 November 2024 by Inspector Moulton E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to outlook and privacy.

the demolition of the existing garages and the erection of 4 no. mews houses (Use Class C3), including private amenity space, cycle parking, waste/recycling storage, landscaping and other ancillary works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Moulton E
Postcode
NW10 5HD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to outlook and privacy
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of occupiers of 103 Whitmore Gardens in respect of loss of light
  • whether the proposal would provide an appropriate mix of housing types having regard to the requirements of the development plan
  • whether the proposal would achieve a suitable standard of fire safety

What decided it

The proposal would not provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers due to unacceptable outlook and inadequate privacy, conflicting with development plan policies that could not be outweighed by the identified benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMP1Policy D6Policy BH6Policy BH13Policy D12A

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

735 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Brent

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266011176
    7 Chalfont Avenue, Wembley, HA9 6NW
  2. Allowed22 October 20266011738
    102 West Hill, Wembley, HA9 9RR
  3. Allowed9 October 20266010212
    276 Willesden Lane, London, NW2 5RB
  4. Dismissed6 October 20266013509
    115 Brondesbury Road, London, NW6 6RY
  5. Allowed1 October 20266011602
    28A Ridley Road, London, NW10 5UA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.