Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed2 September 20243342512

64 Worthington Road, Tolworth, Kingston Upon Thames, KT6 7RX

Planning appeal 3342512 at 64 Worthington Road, Tolworth, Kingston Upon Thames, KT6 7RX (Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames) was allowed on 2 September 2024 by Inspector Davis J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and surrounding area.

demolition of single storey rear extension and conservatory and erection of single storey rear and part first floor rear extensions. Changes to side fenestration

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Davis J
Postcode
KT6 7RX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and surrounding area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of 62 Worthington Road with particular reference to outlook and light

What decided it

The proposed extension would not result in harmful effects on character and appearance or on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, particularly regarding daylight, sunlight and outlook, as demonstrated by the daylight and sunlight assessment and the separation distances involved.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021)Policy CS8 of the Kingston Upon Thames Core Strategy (2012)Policy DM10 of the Kingston Upon Thames Core Strategy (2012)Policy D12 of the London Plan (2021)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

300 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed23 October 20266014767
    13 Hawks Road, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 3DS
  2. Dismissed16 October 20266005462
    150 Ewell Road, Surbiton, KT6 6HE
  3. Dismissed8 October 20266014049
    69 Sheephouse Way, New Malden, KT3 5PF
  4. Dismissed7 October 20266011912
    11 Kingsdowne Road, Surbiton, KT6 6JZ
  5. Dismissed6 October 20266009912
    Onslow House First Floor Flat, 1 Crummock Chase, Surbiton, KT6 4NP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.