Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 December 20243342583

Rook Toll, Faversham Road, Boughton Aluph, Ashford, TN25 4HS

Planning appeal 3342583 at Rook Toll, Faversham Road, Boughton Aluph, Ashford, TN25 4HS (Ashford Borough Council) was dismissed on 23 December 2024 by Inspector Jolly J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be in a suitable location.

for the re-use of 2 No redundant Nissen huts to create 2 No dwellings and the demolition of redundant structures within the site

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Jolly J
Postcode
TN25 4HS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be in a suitable location
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the scenic beauty of the National Landscape
  • ecology
  • the effect of the proposal on the Stodmarsh Lakes and the water environment, east of Canterbury

What decided it

The proposal would harm the ecological integrity and wildlife of the appeal site due to insufficient evidence of mitigation measures, which conflicts with Policy HOU5 and cannot be outweighed by the limited economic and social benefits.

the potential benefits of the proposal, including employment and housing provision, do not outweigh the substantial harm found in relation to ecological integrity

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP1Policy SP6Policy HOU5Policy ENV3aPolicy ENV3bPolicy BAE NP3Policy BAE NP4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 189

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

13 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Ashford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266007592
    Homestall Farm, Ashford Road, High Halden, TN26 3BS
  2. Dismissed26 October 20266009946
    Daniel Farm, Smarden Bell Road, Pluckley, TN27 0SY
  3. Dismissed8 October 20266012673
    Land 150metres East by Southeast of Barkleys Farm, Burnthouse Lane, Smarden, TN27 8QQ
  4. Dismissed30 September 20266011717
    4-6 Ashford Road, Tenterden, TN30 6QU
  5. Dismissed30 September 20266011714
    4-6 Ashford Road, Tenterden, TN30 6QU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.