Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 October 20243342590

Land at Green Lane, Churt, Farnham, GU10 2PA

Permission in Principle for the erection of up to 2 dwellings

Authority
Waverley Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Conde L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the Surrey Hills National Landscape and Area of Great Landscape Value
  • If inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause substantial harm to openness, and the benefits of housing delivery do not clearly outweigh this harm to amount to very special circumstances.

the benefits of housing supply and socio-economic benefits did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness

Framework references: 11, 60, 152, 154

Plan policies cited: Policy RE2, Policy RE3, Policy DM14, Policy SP2

Judgments cited: R.(on the application of Tate) v Northumberland County Council v Susan Leffers-Smith

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.