Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 July 20243342828

67 Briar Crescent, Northolt, UB5 4ND

Planning appeal 3342828 at 67 Briar Crescent, Northolt, UB5 4ND (London Borough of Ealing) was dismissed on 10 July 2024 by Inspector Couper C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host property and the area.

‘retrospective approval of a double storey side extension, a loft conversion, ground floor extension and creation of a porch’

Authority
London Borough of Ealing
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Couper C
Postcode
UB5 4ND

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host property and the area
  • the living conditions of adjacent occupiers, with particular regard to the outlook from 65 Briar Crescent, and any potential for overlooking from the scheme's balcony

What decided it

The rear roof extension is wholly at odds with the character and appearance of the original property and the area, and this harm cannot be justified by the appellant's personal circumstances.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan 2021 Policy D1London Plan 2021 Policy D3London Plan 2021 Policy D4London Plan 2021 Policy D6Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document 2013 Policy 7BEaling Development Management Development Plan Document 2013 Policy 7.4Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document 2013 Policy 7AEaling Regulation 19 Local Plan Policy DAA

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

221 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Ealing

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266014340
    21 Northcote Avenue, Southall, UB1 2AX
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266013917
    94 Pitshanger Lane, Ealing, London, W5 1QX
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266012839
    Station Parade, Advertising Right Adj 1 Uxbridge Road, Ealing, W5 3LD
  4. Dismissed22 October 20266011704
    62, Cornwall Avenue, Southall, UB1 2TG
  5. Dismissed12 October 20266012335
    Land Rear of 4 Greenford Road, Greenford, UB6 9AT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.