®Planning appeal decision
86 Clydesdale, Enfield, EN3 4RN
the erection of a single dwellinghouse (2b3p)
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Manchester S
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the residential occupiers of 84a Clydesdale, with particular regard to outlook.
What decided it
The significant and demonstrable harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, particularly regarding outlook and overbearing impact, outweighed the negligible housing contribution and limited economic benefits of a single dwelling.
The adverse effects of the proposal, particularly significant detriment to neighbouring living conditions, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of one new dwelling and limited economic gains when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.
Framework references: 11
Plan policies cited: Policy CP30 of the Enfield Plan Core Strategy 2010-2025, Policy DMD7 of the Enfield Development Management Document, Policy DMD8 of the Enfield Development Management Document, Policy DMD14 of the Enfield Development Management Document, Policy DMD37 of the Enfield Development Management Document, Policy D3 of the London Plan March 2021
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.