Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 January 20253342869

Land at Hatfield Lodge, The Street, Chilham, Kent, CT4 8DP

Planning appeal 3342869 at Land at Hatfield Lodge, The Street, Chilham, Kent, CT4 8DP (Ashford Borough Council) was dismissed on 13 January 2025 by Inspector Naylor R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the integrity of the Stodmarsh Special Area of Conservation (SAC), Special Protection Area (SPA), Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and Ramsar site.

the erection of one and a half storey dwelling, following the demolition of existing garage

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Naylor R
Postcode
CT4 8DP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the integrity of the Stodmarsh Special Area of Conservation (SAC), Special Protection Area (SPA), Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and Ramsar site
  • the character and appearance of the Chilham conservation area, the setting of the grade II listed buildings of Hatfield Lodge, Hatfield House and The Woolpack Inn and the surrounding area
  • the impact on trees

What decided it

The proposal could not demonstrate nutrient neutrality to protect the integrity of the Stodmarsh SAC, SPA, SSSI and Ramsar site, as the Ashford Borough's mitigation strategy had not been finalised and no mechanism existed to secure the necessary contributions.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
ENV1SP1SP6HOU3aENV3bENV13ENV14
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 193Paragraph 212Paragraph 219Paragraph 220Paragraph 136

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

14 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Ashford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266007592
    Homestall Farm, Ashford Road, High Halden, TN26 3BS
  2. Dismissed26 October 20266009946
    Daniel Farm, Smarden Bell Road, Pluckley, TN27 0SY
  3. Dismissed8 October 20266012673
    Land 150metres East by Southeast of Barkleys Farm, Burnthouse Lane, Smarden, TN27 8QQ
  4. Dismissed30 September 20266011717
    4-6 Ashford Road, Tenterden, TN30 6QU
  5. Dismissed30 September 20266011714
    4-6 Ashford Road, Tenterden, TN30 6QU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.