Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed4 November 20243342882

Land For Development, Muckingford Road, Linford, Essex, SS17 0RR

Planning appeal 3342882 at Land For Development, Muckingford Road, Linford, Essex, SS17 0RR (Thurrock Borough Council) was allowed on 4 November 2024 by Inspector Richard Schofield, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt and its purposes.

application for outline planning permission with some matters (appearance, landscaping, layout and scale) reserved: Proposed development of up to 830 dwellings (Use Class C3) if the Lower Thames Crossing is constructed (scenario 1) and up to 1000 dwellings (Use Class C3) if the Lower Thames Crossing does not proceed (scenario 2), a new local road network including a vehicular / pedestrian railway crossing, a primary school, local centre and new areas of open space, including formal recreation

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Richard Schofield
Postcode
SS17 0RR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt and its purposes
  • whether the appeal proposal would provide appropriate living conditions for future occupiers, regarding noise
  • the effect of the appeal scheme upon the operation of an existing business (being EMR)
  • whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations amounting to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The very substantial weight attributable to the delivery of market and affordable housing in an area with an extremely poor housing land supply record, combined with other benefits, clearly outweighed the substantial Green Belt harm and established the very special circumstances needed to justify the development.

Substantial weight attributed to Green Belt harm (inappropriateness, loss of openness and harm to purposes) was clearly outweighed by very substantial weight to housing delivery, significant weight to the rail bridge, and moderate weight to biodiversity, primary school provision, recreational facilities and economic impacts, amounting to the very special circumstances required to justify the grant of planning permission.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
PMD6PMD1CSSP2CSTP2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 134Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 193
Judgments
Coventry v Lawrence [2014] UKSC 13

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

30 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Thurrock

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed5 October 20266008794
    Milo, South Avenue, Langdon Hills, SS16 6JG
  2. Dismissed29 September 20266009919
    Land Rear of Ewen House, High Road, Fobbing, SS17 9JH
  3. Dismissed23 September 20266010223
    70 London Road,, Thurrock, Grays, RM17 5YB
  4. Allowed28 August 20266008878
    9 Lyndhurst Road, Corringham, SS17 7SJ
  5. Allowed27 July 20266010667
    Willow Cottage, Windsor Avenue, Grays, RM16 2UB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.