Planning appeal decision
11 Hudson Way, London, N9 0FU
creation of second floor addition. 1. The appeal is dismissed
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Jarvis P
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The proposed extension would introduce harmful incongruous and unduly prominent bulk that would unbalance the symmetry of the terrace and conflict with design-led policies requiring extensions to be in keeping with character and not disruptive to the balance of the group of properties.
Plan policies cited: Policy CP30, Policy DMD6, Policy DMD8, Policy DMD11, Policy DMD13, Policy DMD37, Policy D4, Policy D8
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®