Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 November 20243342982

47 The Bourne, London, N14 6RS

Planning appeal 3342982 at 47 The Bourne, London, N14 6RS (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 14 November 2024 by Inspector Scott A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the local area.

Demolition of existing dwelling and creation of 5 dwellings

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Scott A
Postcode
N14 6RS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the local area
  • Whether or not the development would create acceptable living conditions for the future occupants with particular regard to outlook, overlooking and loss of privacy
  • Whether or not there would be a highway and pedestrian safety issue

What decided it

The adverse impacts on character and appearance, living conditions of future occupants, and highway safety significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of housing delivery when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

The adverse impacts of harm to character and appearance, living conditions of future occupants, and highway safety significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of providing four additional homes, environmental improvements, and sustainable location.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CP4CP24CP30CP31DMD 6DMD 8DMD 10DMD 37DMD 44DMD 45DMD 46DMD 47London Plan 2020 D3London Plan 2020 D4London Plan D6London Plan D3London Plan D12London Plan T4London Plan T6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 56

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

535 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  2. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  3. Allowed28 August 20266008361
    9 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
  4. Dismissed20 July 20266010350
    19 Wilbury Way, London, N18 1BU
  5. Dismissed3 June 20266004803
    1 Moffat Road, London, N13 4SA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.