Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 October 20243343118

Basement/Ground Floor Flat, 40 Upper Addison Gardens, LONDON, W14 8AJ

excavation of rear garden and additional outbuilding

Authority
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Han U

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal constitutes basement development and, if so, whether sufficient information has been provided to assess the effects of construction activity on pedestrian, cycle, vehicular and road safety, structural stability, the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties with regard to noise and vibration, and demonstrate that one metre of soil would be provided above any part of the basement beneath a garden
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the appeal building, terrace, communal garden, including whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Holland Park Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposal fails to comply with Policy CL7 by not submitting required construction information and failing to demonstrate one metre of soil above the basement, and would harm the character and appearance of the Holland Park Conservation Area without sufficient public benefits to justify the harm.

Framework references: 115, 205, 208

Plan policies cited: Policy CL7, Policy CL1, Policy CL2, Policy CL3, Policy CL6, Policy CL9, Policy CL11

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.