Planning appeal decision
Land East of Chells Hill, Church Lawton, Cheshire, ST7 3FB
Planning appeal 3343171 at Land East of Chells Hill, Church Lawton, Cheshire, ST7 3FB (Cheshire East) was dismissed on 12 November 2024 by Inspector Walker A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including having regard to its effect on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it.
the periodic use of land on an annual basis (up to 56 days per calendar year) for moto-cross purposes, retention of hardstanding and access, access enhancements, and associated works
- Authority
- Cheshire East
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Change of use
- Inspector
- Walker A
- Postcode
- ST7 3FB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including having regard to its effect on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including the Trent and Mersey Canal Middlewich - Kent Green Conservation Area
- The effect of the development on ecology, with particular regard to trees
- The effect of the development on nearby listed buildings and a non-designated heritage asset
- The effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupants of nearby residential properties, with regard to noise and disturbance
- If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would harm openness and conflict with Green Belt purposes, and the benefits of highway improvements and recreational provision do not clearly outweigh this substantial harm and other harms to character, appearance and ecology.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy PG3Policy SE4Policy SD2Policy SE3Policy SE5Policy SE7Policy SE12Policy ENV6Policy HER1Policy HER3Policy HER4Policy HOU12Policy RUR6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 201Paragraph 205Paragraph 225
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cheshire East
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed13 October 20266009638The Smithy, Adlington Road, Wilmslow, SK9 2LN
- Allowed5 October 20266008576Land At Racecourse Road - Greaves Road, Racecourse Road - Greaves Road, Wilmslow, SK9 5LW
- Allowed2 October 20266010578Land at Dunvilles Farm, Bollington Lane, Chelford Road, Monks Heath, Macclesfield, SK10 4UL
- Dismissed30 September 20266010213Disley Meadow, Lower Greenshall Lane, Disley, SK12 2HH
- Allowed30 September 20266008176Sycamore Farm, Well Bank Lane, Over Peover, WA16 8UN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®