Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 September 20243343310

40 Teignmouth Road, London, NW2 4HN

installation of 3 no. front rooflights, 2 no. rooflights on the front gable roof, and 2 no. rear rooflights over the outrigger to dwellinghouse

Authority
London Borough of Brent
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Conde L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Mapesbury Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposed rooflights would cause less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Mapesbury Conservation Area, and the private benefit of natural light to the occupants provides no public benefit to outweigh this harm to a designated heritage asset.

Framework references: 208

Plan policies cited: BHC1, DMP1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.