Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 September 20243343389

279 Malden Road, New Malden, KT3 6AH

Planning appeal 3343389 at 279 Malden Road, New Malden, KT3 6AH (Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames) was dismissed on 27 September 2024 by Inspector Morris T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of occupiers of No 277 Malden Road, with particular regard to outlook.

‘proposed single storey front porch, with a part single part two storey side extension, with a part single storey part two storey rear extension, with demolition removal of the existing shed’

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Morris T
Postcode
KT3 6AH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of occupiers of No 277 Malden Road, with particular regard to outlook

What decided it

The considerable depth, mass and very close proximity of the two-storey side extension to the side elevation and first-floor window of No 277 Malden Road would create an unacceptable enclosing and oppressive effect on the living conditions and outlook of its occupiers.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3 (Optimising site capacity through the design-led approach) of the London Plan (2021)Policy DM10 (Design requirements for new developments (including house extensions)) of the Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames Core Strategy (2012)Policy CS8 (Character, Design and Heritage) of the Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames Core Strategy (2012)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

206 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed23 October 20266014767
    13 Hawks Road, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 3DS
  2. Dismissed16 October 20266005462
    150 Ewell Road, Surbiton, KT6 6HE
  3. Dismissed8 October 20266014049
    69 Sheephouse Way, New Malden, KT3 5PF
  4. Dismissed7 October 20266011912
    11 Kingsdowne Road, Surbiton, KT6 6JZ
  5. Dismissed6 October 20266009912
    Onslow House First Floor Flat, 1 Crummock Chase, Surbiton, KT6 4NP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.