Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed13 September 20243343475

17 Normanton Park, London, E4 6HE

Planning appeal 3343475 at 17 Normanton Park, London, E4 6HE (Waltham Forest London Borough Council) was allowed on 13 September 2024 by Inspector A Hartley, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

for a two-part double-storey side/rear extension

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
A Hartley
Postcode
E4 6HE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the living conditions of the occupiers of No. 15 Normanton Park particularly in relation to creating an overbearing sense of enclosure and overshadowing of the private rear amenity space
  • future development of No. 15 Normanton Park

What decided it

The proposal achieves good design appropriate to context, maintains the recognised street scene feature of a gap between the terraced and semi-detached properties, and does not unacceptably harm the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 53 of the Waltham Forest Local Plan Part One – Shaping the Borough 2020-2035 (2024)Policy 57 of the Waltham Forest Local Plan Part One – Shaping the Borough 2020-2035 (2024)Policy 5 of the Waltham Forest Local Plan Part One – Shaping the Borough 2020-2035 (2024)Policy D1 of the London Plan (2021)Policy D4 of the London Plan (2021)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

219 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Waltham Forest London Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed22 October 20266011485
    Land Adjoining 120 Warner Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 7DZ
  2. Allowed20 October 20266013085
    53 Badlis Road, London, E17 5LG
  3. Dismissed29 September 20266012954
    Unit 1, 6 - 10, Central Parade, 137 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 4RT
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266012953
    Unit 1, 6 - 10, Central Parade, 137 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 4RT
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266011926
    220 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 3AY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.