Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 August 20243343501

92B Sutherland Avenue, Biggin Hill, WESTERHAM, TN16 3HG

‘first floor side extension’

Authority
London Borough of Bromley
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Clark L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 92a Sutherland Avenue with specific regard to outlook
  • the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The overbearing effect of the extension on the outlook and living conditions of the neighbouring property 92a Sutherland Avenue, which caused unacceptable harm contrary to the development plan.

Plan policies cited: Policy 6, Policy 37, Policy 8, Policy D3 of the London Plan 2021

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.