Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 November 20243343550

Frederick Court, 63 Albert Road, South Woodford, London, E18 1LE

Planning appeal 3343550 at Frederick Court, 63 Albert Road, South Woodford, London, E18 1LE (London Borough of Redbridge) was dismissed on 7 November 2024 by Inspector Hunter A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether future occupiers of the proposed development would have satisfactory living conditions with particular regard to privacy, outlook, and outdoor space provision.

garage conversion studio flat”

Authority
London Borough of Redbridge
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hunter A
Postcode
E18 1LE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether future occupiers of the proposed development would have satisfactory living conditions with particular regard to privacy, outlook, and outdoor space provision

What decided it

The poor outlook and lack of privacy for future occupiers, arising from the single meaningful aspect and the overlooked outdoor space, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited housing benefits of the proposal.

The limited benefits of providing one additional small unit of housing in a sustainable location were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to living conditions of future occupiers from poor outlook and lack of privacy in the outdoor space.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
LP Policy D3LP Policy D6Redbridge Local Plan Policy LP26Redbridge Local Plan Policy LP29
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

383 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Redbridge

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Quashed On Legal Grounds29 September 20263372674
    Land at 112 Highbury Gardens , Seven King , Ilford , IG3 8AA
  2. Allowed25 September 20266013032
    289 Roding Lane North, Woodford Green, Essex, IG8 8LH
  3. Dismissed25 September 20263361999
    2A Hall Road, Chadwell Heath, Romford, RM6 4LH
  4. Allowed25 September 20263360229
    38, Hertford Road, Newbury Park, Ilford, IG2 7HF
  5. Notice varied and upheld23 September 20263369444
    12 Westrow Gardens, Ilford, IG3 9NE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.