Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 February 20253343684

Coventry Arms, Mill Street, Corfe Mullen, Dorset, BH21 3RH

Planning appeal 3343684 at Coventry Arms, Mill Street, Corfe Mullen, Dorset, BH21 3RH (Dorset) was dismissed on 13 February 2025 by Inspector Butcher C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including the effect upon the openness of the Green Belt.

alterations to outside space

Authority
Dorset
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Butcher C
Postcode
BH21 3RH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including the effect upon the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether the development would be likely to increase the likelihood of flooding in the area
  • Would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The absence of an acceptable Flood Risk Assessment combined with the inappropriate nature of the development in the Green Belt means the identified harms are not clearly outweighed by the material benefits of supporting the public house business.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy KS3Policy ME6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 176

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

27 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Dorset

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266010776
    The Bothey, Clayford, Wimborne, BH21 7BJ
  2. Dismissed2 October 20266012115
    55, Boundary Lane, St Leonards and St Ives, BH24 2SE
  3. Dismissed24 August 20266007369
    38 Brook Lane, Corfe Mullen, BH21 3RD
  4. Dismissed12 August 20266007277
    Shady Glades, Long Lane, Wimborne, BH21 7AQ
  5. Dismissed7 August 20266007075
    The Ferns, Poole Road, Jubilee Cross, Lytchett Matravers, BH16 6AF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.