Planning appeal decision
50 Wash Lane, Kessingland, Suffolk, NR33 7QY
Planning appeal 3343685 at 50 Wash Lane, Kessingland, Suffolk, NR33 7QY (East Suffolk) was dismissed on 21 January 2025 by Inspector Jones H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area.
construction of dwelling and materials
- Authority
- East Suffolk
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Jones H
- Postcode
- NR33 7QY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effects of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area
- The effects of the proposed development upon the living conditions of the occupiers of 44, 46, 48 and 50 Wash Lane with particular regard to the proposal's access arrangements
- The effects of the proposed development upon the integrity of Habitats Sites
What decided it
The inability to rule out adverse effects upon the integrity of the Benacre to Easton Bavents Special Protection Area in the absence of any secured mitigation measures weighed very heavily against the proposal and was decisive.
The modest contribution to housing supply and the benefit of delivering an accessible dwelling suitable for disabled or elderly occupiers were outweighed by the very heavy weight against the proposal arising from the inability to rule out adverse effects on the integrity of a Habitats Site, which requires imperative reasons of overriding public interest to justify permission.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy WLP8.29Policy WLP8.33Policy WLP8.34Policy H2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 195
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in East Suffolk
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed5 August 20266007229Herons, Church Field, Walberswick, Southwold, IP18 6TG
- Allowed1 July 20266005926Herons, Church Field, Walberswick, Southwold, IP18 6TG
- Quashed On Legal Grounds15 June 20263345362Land South of 333 High Street, Walton, Felixstowe, Suffolk, IP11 9QL
- Dismissed4 December 202533692432 Clare Avenue, Woodbridge, IP12 4ES
- Dismissed4 August 20253354090The Old Vicarage, Low Street, Brandeston, Ipswich, IP147AN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®