Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 October 20243343808

331 Lea Bridge Road, London, E10 7LA

Planning appeal 3343808 at 331 Lea Bridge Road, London, E10 7LA (Waltham Forest London Borough Council) was dismissed on 17 October 2024 by Inspector Francis M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the host building and the character and appearance of the area.

construction of ground and first floor extension to facilitate the increased floor area of existing flats

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Francis M
Postcode
E10 7LA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the host building and the character and appearance of the area
  • the living conditions of the occupiers of the flats with regards to the provision of internal space and natural light and outlook for Studio Flats D and E
  • the living conditions of the occupiers of No 329 Lea Bridge Road with regards to outlook, daylight and sunlight
  • the effect of the proposal on the occupiers of the flats with regard to privacy and the provision of private amenity space (Appeal B only)

What decided it

The proposals would cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area through overdevelopment and loss of garden space, combined with inadequate living conditions for future occupiers and potential harm to neighbouring amenity.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
LP Policy 53LP Policy 56LP Policy 57London Plan Policy D1London Plan Policy D4London Plan Policy D6London Plan Policy D12(A)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

458 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Waltham Forest London Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed22 October 20266011485
    Land Adjoining 120 Warner Road, Walthamstow, London, E17 7DZ
  2. Allowed20 October 20266013085
    53 Badlis Road, London, E17 5LG
  3. Dismissed29 September 20266012954
    Unit 1, 6 - 10, Central Parade, 137 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 4RT
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266012953
    Unit 1, 6 - 10, Central Parade, 137 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 4RT
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266011926
    220 Hoe Street, Walthamstow, London, E17 3AY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.